Note that these answers were current at date of publication and are meant as guidance for pharmacy professionals. The College cannot tell a registrant what course of action to take, provide legal advice or opinions, or make any decisions for a registrant.
Q: Are pharmacies still required to subscribe to a drug information service?
Q: Now that the Cannabis Regulations allow the sale of edibles and topicals, can a patient bring their own cannabis to a pharmacist to have it compounded into a capsule or a cream?
Q: We received a prescription with a statement that it was electronically signed by the prescriber but there is no actual signature on it. What are the regulations around this?
Please note the following message from the National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA):
NAPRA UPDATES ITS POLICY ON NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS
NAPRA is updating its policy on and approach to Natural Health Products (NHPs) in NAPRA’s National Drug Schedules with the best interest of the public as its first and foremost concern.
NAPRA will remove NHPs currently listed within the National Drug Schedules (NDS) in a stepwise, risk-based approach:
1) Effective January 2, 2020: NHPs currently listed within the Unscheduled category and within Schedule III will be removed from the NDS. At Health Canada’s request, ephedrine and pseudoephedrine will continue to be subject to the conditions of sales as outlined in NDS Schedule III until January 2, 2021.
2) Effective January 2, 2022: NHPs currently listed within Schedules I and II will be removed from the NDS.
As of 2022, all products with a Natural Product Number (NPN) or Drug Identification Number-Homeopathic Medicine (DIN-HM) from Health Canada will be considered outside the scope of NAPRA’s National Drug Schedules.
The NDS were developed before Health Canada began regulating the sale of NHPs in Canada. When the Natural Health Products Regulations came into force in 2004, many products that were included in the NDS became re-classified as NHPs by Health Canada. Although NHPs are beyond the scope of NAPRA’s NDS, NAPRA agreed to maintain the substances that were already listed in the NDS on an interim basis until direction could be provided by the federal government regarding a framework for determining conditions of sale for NHPs in Canada.
This interim measure was never meant to be a permanent solution to address the risks of the entire class of NHPs. The NDS were developed to assess drugs and are not conducive to the review of NHPs, which have significantly different requirements to obtain authorization for sale in Canada than non-prescription drugs. The NDS only include a few NHPs that used to be classified as drugs before Health Canada re-classified them as NHPs. There are many other NHPs which may also present risks that have no restrictions on sale, because the federal NHP Regulations do not address conditions of sale.
Given that the interim measure initiated many years ago only addresses the risk of a small subset of NHPs while others are available to consumers without directed conditions of sale, NAPRA has determined that this approach is no longer in the best interest of the public. For full public safety, all NHPs should be evaluated for conditions of sale by an appropriate framework designed for that purpose by relevant stakeholders.
Over the past 10 years, NAPRA has recommended the development of a framework that addresses the risks of the entire class of NHPs. NAPRA will continue to work with stakeholders to encourage the development of such a framework, which would provide the public with a consistent and comprehensive approach to the sale of all NHPs in Canada.
See NAPRA’s Policy on NHPs for more information.